Dressed to Kill (1980)
Dressed to Kill (1980)
What do you get when you combine Alfred Hitchcock and a
thriller suspense story from the 1980’s? Well, you would get 1980’s thriller Dressed to Kill. From the beginning, you
can tell that director Brian De Palma was trying to emulate Alfred Hitchcock’s
films of old. Many young filmmakers at the time tried to make films with a
Hitchcock influence, but many of them failed. However, Dressed to Kill mostly succeeded in creating a “Hitchcock” film.
According to famed critic Roger Ebert, “He (De Palma) places his emphasis on
the same things that obsessed Hitchcock: precise camera movements, meticulously
selected visual movements, characters seen as types rather than personalities,
and violence as a sudden interruption of the most mundane situations.” While
the movie may not be peak Hitchcock, we get have an entertaining thriller that
is violent, engaging, and surprisingly effective.
My first thought of the movie was that it is a strangely
erotic movie. In all honesty, it is really a softcore porn movie, at least that
is what it felt like to me. It is a movie that pushes sex up to the top and
then some. It does star some respectable Hollywood actors and a well-loved
director, so at least the names give the movie legitimacy. Let me tell you why
I believed this film was a porno at first. Just listen to the plot. There is
this middle-aged woman named Kate Miller (Angie Dickinson) who is frustrated
with her sexual life. She goes to a therapist named Dr. Robert Elliot (Michael
Caine) to help her through her crisis. After a session with the therapist, she
randomly meets this guy at a museum and they have sex. After she finds out he
has a STD, she leaves hastily. The problem is that she forgets her wedding
ring. As she goes back to retrieve her ring, she is brutally murdered with a
razor. Now there are all sorts of problems as everyone tries to track down the
killer.
I thought the performances were solid ones. The big name
here is Michael Caine. He does wonderful in all his films, and there is no
difference here. His character is very charismatic, but there is a hint of
darkness hidden behind the charisma, and that interested me because I am used
to Michael Caine playing a beloved, helpful good guy. Angie Dickinson gave a
solid performance as the sexually-deprived housewife. I am still on the fence
about Nancy Allen’s performance. She played a high-class prostitute named Liz
Blake and was named the only suspect for the murder. Her performance went
over-the-top at times, a little more than I was comfortable with. It’s funny
because she was nominated both for a Golden Globe and a Razzie for her
performance.
One important thing to note about the movie is that it is
not pushed forward narratively. De Palma and writer George Litto made this film
more of a stylistic one. Also, certain themes we look at today were looked at
differently thirty-seven years ago. The movie has a strange way in using transsexuality
and schizophrenia to build the case for the homicidal maniac seen killing
people in the movie. There are plot issues at hand, but plot is not the
strongest suit of the film. It is all about the shocker value that is
effectively delivered.
Dressed to Kill is
an interesting movie to say the least. It’s an erotic thriller that follows the
footsteps of earlier Hitchcock movies. But one thing to note is that it is not
a Hitchcock film, but De Palma comes very close in recreating one. The film is
suspenseful, thrilling, and there are what seems to be an indefinite amount of
twists and turns. If anything, you get to see Michael Caine deliver a
performance outside of his wheelhouse.
My Grade: B
Comments
Post a Comment