Shampoo (1975)

Shampoo (1975)
Shampoo was a major disappointment for me. It had a fantastic cast headlined by Warren Beatty and Julie Christie whom both worked so well together previously in McCabe and Mrs. Miller. It had a great director in Hal Ashby who directed other critically well-received works such as Harold and Maude and Coming Home. The script was written by Robert Towne, who wrote what some critics call the best screenplay of all time with 1974’s Chinatown. The movie was promised as a black comedy with political farce and it was quite the daring, edgy movie for a 1975 release. So if you add up these ingredients, this movie has to be good, right? Unfortunately, there were problems. Enough problems to make me wonder how on earth did this film get nominated for four Academy Awards. Well, let’s talk about these issues more in-depth.



I did not think the movie was especially funny. There were some amusing moments for sure, but I never laughed or even chuckled the way I was meant to. Towne’s script left something to be desired especially after what he did with Chinatown. I can admire what he was shooting for, but the film wasn’t satirical enough. The setting of the movie was 1968 when Richard Nixon was just about to enter office, and the film was released shortly after Watergate and the resignation of Nixon. I know the whole thing was supposed to be a farce on that administration, but it was not sharp enough. I generally had no issues with the acting, but the characters are so unlikable. Warren Beatty just played a man using women for sex, including with a teenage girl and I was just thinking ugh to myself. The movie came out in a different time period, but man women are not portrayed well. They just want to be laid. Every…..single……woman it seems. That gives the movie an awfully dated look.



George (Warren Beatty) works as a hairdresser for a living. He is a mid-30’s man who swoons over his customers in the shop and in bed. His girlfriend is Jill (Goldie Hawn), a wannabe actress and naïve to her man’s sexual habits. Her best friend is Jackie (Julie Christie) who happened to have a previous relationship with George so of course she knows better. She currently is having an affair with an older businessman named Lester (Jack Warden) who happens to be the guy with connections when it comes to George starting his own salon and needing financial resources to do so. Lester’s wife, Felicia (Lee Grant) happens to be a regular customer of George’s and she wants sex with him because she has been deprived of sex. Then just because, George begins sexual interactions with Lorna, Lester’s daughter. Of course, all of these sexual affairs will come to a collision for George.



The performances are fine, although I did particularly love any character. Warren Beatty and Julie Christie apparently love working together, and they do have great chemistry. Jack Warden is quite sinister as Lester. Lee Grant actually won an Oscar for her role here, and whether she deserves it or not is up in the air. However, I shall not deny that she gives the best performance of the film. Also, keep an eye out for Carrie Fisher as young Lorna. She delivers a very capable performance in this role before Star Wars rocketed her to fame.



I wish I could have liked Shampoo more than I did. There were some good intentions, but the movie did not deliver the promised goods. The ending was also weak and messy. Solid performances, a great soundtrack (that features The Beatles and Buffalo Springfield to name a few), and a few amusing moments are not enough to save this movie. It’s not a complete, utter failure, but that line is in plain sight. How the movie was received well during awards season goes beyond me, but movies are subjective so that’s that.



My Grade: C-

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ferris Bueller's Day Off (1986)

Image
Ferris Bueller's Day Off (1986) “Life moves pretty fast. If you don’t stop and look around once in awhile, you could miss it.” Ah, wise words from our new young friend, Ferris Bueller. In John Hughes’s 1986 film, Ferris Bueller’s Day Off , all Ferris wants to do is take a day and have fun. That is the most simplistic theme the movie has. You can go deeper, but the main takeaway is that it is okay to have fun. That is a motto I have taken to heart. I really loved the film. People consider The Breakfast Club to be Hughes’s best and most important movie. That’s a fine statement to make, but I would personally rank the film number two behind this particular one. The teen characters are instantly relatable, it has a memorable antagonist for the children, and this is basically a thirty-year-old travel guide for Chicago. Just how Woody Allen creates his movies as love letters for New York, this is applicable for John Hughes. A Chicago love letter!   Like all of his films, Hughes wrote...
Read more

The Spy Who Loved Me (1977)

Image
The Spy Who Loved Me (1977) The James Bond franchise is one of those franchises that will never die. It has been going strong since the first movie rolled out in the early 1960’s, and new James Bond movies are still produced today. What makes this series unique is they use multiple actors to play the titular character over the years. They all bring their own gravitas to the role, and each Bond is a different man when compared to each other (although the martini, shaken not stirred and the beautiful women among other things remain a constant.) So my first James Bond review for this blog is 1977’s The Spy Who Loved Me. This wasn’t my first look at the series, but it was my first look at the older movies. I really liked what I saw. This is an old-fashioned story that combines a spy drama and an action-packed war movie into one package. Like many of the older Bond movies, the story can get borderline preposterous. The cheesiness of the plot did come to grow on me after awhile, even...
Read more

Table for Five (1983)

Image
Table for Five (1983) I can guarantee that ninety percent of my readers here have not seen this tear-jerking melodrama 1983’s Table for Five , yet alone heard of it. Hopefully after reading my kind words, you will be somewhat intrigued by this movie. When doing my research for the film, I was shocked to see how vastly underrated the movie is. There are only a few reviews on Rotten Tomatoes, hardly any information on Wikipedia or Google-hardly anything out there in this vast Internet landscape. Then, why on earth is this movie so good? Sure, maybe some folks will say the movie is just a predictable Lifetime TV movie, but honestly it is much more than that. There are some elements that makes this film seem destined for the television at times, but to me it is much more than that. I consider the movie to be an honest, emotional portrayal about fatherhood and family. Directed by Robert Lieberman, this film is about a man named J.P Tannen (Jon Voight) who fails at being fathe...
Read more