Arthur (1981)

Arthur (1981)
I may be in the minority, but I did not think too highly of the 1981 comedy Arthur. Those who know me well knows that I had mixed feelings on screwball comedies. Some are great, but the majority don’t do it for me. This movie plays out as a 1930’s screwball comedy but set in the 1980’s. The movie is energetic and has a fast pace to it, but it did not work well for me. To me, a good movie is all about have likeable characters that you can relate to. The main character in Arthur is not who I aspire to be and it was not fun watching his drunken personality travel all over New York City trying to be the rich womanizer that he is.



Arthur (Dudley Moore) is a permanently-drunk bachelor worth over $750 million dollars. He is always drunk, has no ambition, and is always on an endless quest for love. His daily routine has him waking up every morning, his butler Hobson (John Gielgud) drawing him a bath, drinking a martini, and then travelling around Manhattan in his limousine trying to pick up girls. His controlling father has him set to marry the boring Susan, but that plan is about to change when he meets Linda (Liza Minnelli). He catches her stealing a tie in a Queens store and he helps her escape trouble. They fall in love with each other. The problem is, Arthur’s fortune will be taken away if he doesn’t follow the plan to marry Susan.



For the most part, the performances were decent. Dudley Moore is merely okay as Arthur, mainly because his drunk act was rather cringe-worthy. When he was sober, he does admittedly deliver an effective performance. I was never a big Liza Minnelli fan, but I think she does very well here. That said, the romance between Moore and Minnelli was not believable. The real acting standout goes to John Gielgud as the butler, Hobson. He was not like other English butlers. His dialogue was razor-sharp and he delivers them that way. Despite not liking Arthur’s attitude, Gielgud’s Hobson wanted to see Arthur succeed against his power-hungry father and grandmother. He won an Oscar for his performance and I agree with that assessment. Gielgud is by far the best part of the movie.



The film was written and directed by Steve Gordon. This was his first feature film and sadly his last as he passed away not long after this film’s release. That was a shame because he showed some ability with this film. Before the casting of Moore, he actually had a good list of actors he wanted to portray Arthur such as Al Pacino and Jack Nicholson. Now that is something I would love to see. I also did like the music. The film music was created by Burt Bacharach and he added a NYC musical feeling to the movie.



Overall, I came away disappointed with the movie. It received critical notice and won a few accolades, but I came in the minority. Maybe I have a heart of stone (I don’t think I do), but the laughs were too few. I think John Gielgud single-handedly saved the movie from complete failure. Maybe I wasn’t attracted to the story of a drunk playboy (albeit happy drunk playboy) cruising around the city. That said, this film is gold compared to the sequel and the remake that occurred 30 years later.



My Grade: C

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ferris Bueller's Day Off (1986)

Image
Ferris Bueller's Day Off (1986) “Life moves pretty fast. If you don’t stop and look around once in awhile, you could miss it.” Ah, wise words from our new young friend, Ferris Bueller. In John Hughes’s 1986 film, Ferris Bueller’s Day Off , all Ferris wants to do is take a day and have fun. That is the most simplistic theme the movie has. You can go deeper, but the main takeaway is that it is okay to have fun. That is a motto I have taken to heart. I really loved the film. People consider The Breakfast Club to be Hughes’s best and most important movie. That’s a fine statement to make, but I would personally rank the film number two behind this particular one. The teen characters are instantly relatable, it has a memorable antagonist for the children, and this is basically a thirty-year-old travel guide for Chicago. Just how Woody Allen creates his movies as love letters for New York, this is applicable for John Hughes. A Chicago love letter!   Like all of his films, Hughes wrote...
Read more

The Spy Who Loved Me (1977)

Image
The Spy Who Loved Me (1977) The James Bond franchise is one of those franchises that will never die. It has been going strong since the first movie rolled out in the early 1960’s, and new James Bond movies are still produced today. What makes this series unique is they use multiple actors to play the titular character over the years. They all bring their own gravitas to the role, and each Bond is a different man when compared to each other (although the martini, shaken not stirred and the beautiful women among other things remain a constant.) So my first James Bond review for this blog is 1977’s The Spy Who Loved Me. This wasn’t my first look at the series, but it was my first look at the older movies. I really liked what I saw. This is an old-fashioned story that combines a spy drama and an action-packed war movie into one package. Like many of the older Bond movies, the story can get borderline preposterous. The cheesiness of the plot did come to grow on me after awhile, even...
Read more

Table for Five (1983)

Image
Table for Five (1983) I can guarantee that ninety percent of my readers here have not seen this tear-jerking melodrama 1983’s Table for Five , yet alone heard of it. Hopefully after reading my kind words, you will be somewhat intrigued by this movie. When doing my research for the film, I was shocked to see how vastly underrated the movie is. There are only a few reviews on Rotten Tomatoes, hardly any information on Wikipedia or Google-hardly anything out there in this vast Internet landscape. Then, why on earth is this movie so good? Sure, maybe some folks will say the movie is just a predictable Lifetime TV movie, but honestly it is much more than that. There are some elements that makes this film seem destined for the television at times, but to me it is much more than that. I consider the movie to be an honest, emotional portrayal about fatherhood and family. Directed by Robert Lieberman, this film is about a man named J.P Tannen (Jon Voight) who fails at being fathe...
Read more