Enter the Dragon (1973)

 Enter the Dragon (1973)


1973’s Enter the Dragon was America’s…and my first foray into the kung-fu world of Bruce Lee. Prior to this film, Lee was an international superstar but has seen limited success in the States. This film changed everything. It became a very successful film, but sadly is the swansong for Lee due to his untimely death. I was incredibly surprised by how much I enjoyed this feature. The story is borderline silly at times, but I was taken aback how the story became a “low-rent” spy thriller a la James Bond…which I enjoyed. Lee has proven himself as a great actor and seeing his fighting moves impressed me. I try to avoid martial art films because they do not appeal to me, but I need to catch up on Bruce Lee’s work.

Due to Lee’s global success, Warner Brothers joined forces with Lee to produce the movie and bring it to a wider American audience. The production received a very modest budget, but director Robert Crouse and his team made every penny count. The screenplay was written by Michael Allin and it was considered an advanced screenplay. What I mean it that it gave equal and fair treatment to different races. Having heroic characters played by Black, Asian, and White people was unusual for its time. It was one of the main reasons why it reached an international audience. In addition to some excellent choreographed fighting scenes, the script manages some great lines. I liked the scene where Lee explained his style of fighting is “fighting without fighting.” A very wise human! I was expecting plenty of martial arts, but the script combined it with a thrilling, albeit a bit preposterous spy film which totally intrigued me.

This film takes place in Hong Kong in 1973. Lee (Bruce Lee) is a master of martial arts at a Shaolin Temple and believes his martial art skills are an essence of his spirituality. He is visited by a British law officer who invites him to a martial arts tournament held by Han, a reclusive billionaire who used to be a part of the Temple, but now is on the other side of the law. Han has initial reservations, but they quickly disappear when he learns that Han’s American sidekick was behind the death of his sister. He is now tasked to find out about Han’s drug and prostitution activities. In addition to Lee, two Americans, Roper (John Saxon) and Williams (Jim Kelly) also attend the proceedings. As the tournament begins, the three men are at the mercy of Han and his people.

When I think of the name, “Bruce Lee,” I think of martial arts expert before I think of him as an actor. This movie proves that he has some excellent acting ability, and I became emotionally invested in his character. Of course, he puts good use to his martial arts. People have complained that he does the same moves in each of his films (I have yet to find out), but I wouldn’t really care because they are awesome! The other actors deliver good performances although I would not say they did anything special, but serviceable enough to act alongside Lee. After all, this film is all about the power of Bruce Lee.

Overall, Enter the Dragon is a very fun movie. Yes, the story is silly, but Bruce Lee manages to save the story and create something fun out of it…and delivered real emotion. Lee would have been a mainstay in Hollywood if not for his premature death. Still, he managed to create something special…and perhaps a passing of the torch. Another man gifted in the kung-fu arts is seen as an extra…and that is Jackie Chan. This is a worthy action film worth seeing to see the gifts of Bruce Lee.

My Grade: B+

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ferris Bueller's Day Off (1986)

Image
Ferris Bueller's Day Off (1986) “Life moves pretty fast. If you don’t stop and look around once in awhile, you could miss it.” Ah, wise words from our new young friend, Ferris Bueller. In John Hughes’s 1986 film, Ferris Bueller’s Day Off , all Ferris wants to do is take a day and have fun. That is the most simplistic theme the movie has. You can go deeper, but the main takeaway is that it is okay to have fun. That is a motto I have taken to heart. I really loved the film. People consider The Breakfast Club to be Hughes’s best and most important movie. That’s a fine statement to make, but I would personally rank the film number two behind this particular one. The teen characters are instantly relatable, it has a memorable antagonist for the children, and this is basically a thirty-year-old travel guide for Chicago. Just how Woody Allen creates his movies as love letters for New York, this is applicable for John Hughes. A Chicago love letter!   Like all of his films, Hughes wrote...
Read more

The Spy Who Loved Me (1977)

Image
The Spy Who Loved Me (1977) The James Bond franchise is one of those franchises that will never die. It has been going strong since the first movie rolled out in the early 1960’s, and new James Bond movies are still produced today. What makes this series unique is they use multiple actors to play the titular character over the years. They all bring their own gravitas to the role, and each Bond is a different man when compared to each other (although the martini, shaken not stirred and the beautiful women among other things remain a constant.) So my first James Bond review for this blog is 1977’s The Spy Who Loved Me. This wasn’t my first look at the series, but it was my first look at the older movies. I really liked what I saw. This is an old-fashioned story that combines a spy drama and an action-packed war movie into one package. Like many of the older Bond movies, the story can get borderline preposterous. The cheesiness of the plot did come to grow on me after awhile, even...
Read more

Table for Five (1983)

Image
Table for Five (1983) I can guarantee that ninety percent of my readers here have not seen this tear-jerking melodrama 1983’s Table for Five , yet alone heard of it. Hopefully after reading my kind words, you will be somewhat intrigued by this movie. When doing my research for the film, I was shocked to see how vastly underrated the movie is. There are only a few reviews on Rotten Tomatoes, hardly any information on Wikipedia or Google-hardly anything out there in this vast Internet landscape. Then, why on earth is this movie so good? Sure, maybe some folks will say the movie is just a predictable Lifetime TV movie, but honestly it is much more than that. There are some elements that makes this film seem destined for the television at times, but to me it is much more than that. I consider the movie to be an honest, emotional portrayal about fatherhood and family. Directed by Robert Lieberman, this film is about a man named J.P Tannen (Jon Voight) who fails at being fathe...
Read more