Black Rain (1989)

 Black Rain (1989)


There is stuff to like in Ridley Scott’s Black Rain. Sadly, the good stuff is overshadowed by its cliched, paper-thin story with a predictable ending and characters that are not fully developed. A quote about Scott came to mind. “Being a Ridley Scott film, it’s 90% atmosphere and 10% story.” Maybe a good portion of his films are not that dramatic, but I related to that quote here. But what an atmosphere the movie has! Osaka has been used in many films, but never like this. Scott always had an impressive hand with visuals. While watching the movie, Blade Runner came to mind. Yet in that story, the characters used the visuals and production design for a purpose. Here, not so much. The dark, Gotham-like feeling seems to be here just because. Still, Jan De Bont’s camerawork and Norris Spencer’s production design are expertly staged and plays a major reason why the film remains as watchable as it is.

I was struck by the plot because I am fascinated in groups that have a mysterious aura about them or I do not know too much about. The Japanese underworld, known as the Yakuza, fit that category. The whole mystery part would work well with the dreary, bleak world that Scott envisioned. Thankfully, I did maintain some degree of interest. The whole mystery was bogged down by poorly written characters and events that are extremely unlikely. Like and events that are extremely unlikely. Like how will an American woman from Chicago will know the secrets of the Yakuza? Even though she bartended in Osaka for eight years, I was immediately turned off by that plot point. Craig Bolotin’s and Warren Lewis’s screenplay also fails to make me understand how is it possible that mafia men disguised as Japanese cops are able to successfully meet a high-profile criminal at the airport? That is lazy writing, or poorly researched. One or the other.

After committing a double murder in New York City, a member of the Yakuza is arrested. Detective Nick Conklin (Michael Douglas) and his partner Charlie Vincent (Andy Garcia) are given the duty to escort this man back to Japan. Conklin, who may or may not be a seedy cop, is angry that the United States is not prosecuting this man. When they arrive, the criminal is turned over to Yakuza members disguised as police. The detectives stay and work with Detective Masahiro (Ken Takahura) to recapture their man. As they do so, they find it hard to work within the laws and customs of Japan.

I found nothing wrong with the lead performances. In fact, I found Michael Douglas to be highly captivating and made a poorly scripted character interesting. Andy Garcia also delivered a good, commendable performance. Kate Capshaw did not interest me. I never liked her as an actress, so it was highly unlikely a flawed character (and completely unbelievable) would allow me to be convinced otherwise.

Overall, Black Rain is not Ridley Scott’s finest. It is not a horrible movie and remains highly watchable. Yet, style is more at play than substance. The technical side of the movie is a reason why the movie should be given a watch. Loved the brooding production design and camerawork. That reminds me. Hans Zimmer, in his first working relationship with Scott, delivered an underrated score. There, another reason to watch the movie! If only it wasn’t for a shoddy script, Scott’s movie would have been fun. His directorial flair is all over the place…in a mostly good way. Wish I could say the same about the movie.

My Grade: C

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ferris Bueller's Day Off (1986)

Image
Ferris Bueller's Day Off (1986) “Life moves pretty fast. If you don’t stop and look around once in awhile, you could miss it.” Ah, wise words from our new young friend, Ferris Bueller. In John Hughes’s 1986 film, Ferris Bueller’s Day Off , all Ferris wants to do is take a day and have fun. That is the most simplistic theme the movie has. You can go deeper, but the main takeaway is that it is okay to have fun. That is a motto I have taken to heart. I really loved the film. People consider The Breakfast Club to be Hughes’s best and most important movie. That’s a fine statement to make, but I would personally rank the film number two behind this particular one. The teen characters are instantly relatable, it has a memorable antagonist for the children, and this is basically a thirty-year-old travel guide for Chicago. Just how Woody Allen creates his movies as love letters for New York, this is applicable for John Hughes. A Chicago love letter!   Like all of his films, Hughes wrote...
Read more

The Spy Who Loved Me (1977)

Image
The Spy Who Loved Me (1977) The James Bond franchise is one of those franchises that will never die. It has been going strong since the first movie rolled out in the early 1960’s, and new James Bond movies are still produced today. What makes this series unique is they use multiple actors to play the titular character over the years. They all bring their own gravitas to the role, and each Bond is a different man when compared to each other (although the martini, shaken not stirred and the beautiful women among other things remain a constant.) So my first James Bond review for this blog is 1977’s The Spy Who Loved Me. This wasn’t my first look at the series, but it was my first look at the older movies. I really liked what I saw. This is an old-fashioned story that combines a spy drama and an action-packed war movie into one package. Like many of the older Bond movies, the story can get borderline preposterous. The cheesiness of the plot did come to grow on me after awhile, even...
Read more

Table for Five (1983)

Image
Table for Five (1983) I can guarantee that ninety percent of my readers here have not seen this tear-jerking melodrama 1983’s Table for Five , yet alone heard of it. Hopefully after reading my kind words, you will be somewhat intrigued by this movie. When doing my research for the film, I was shocked to see how vastly underrated the movie is. There are only a few reviews on Rotten Tomatoes, hardly any information on Wikipedia or Google-hardly anything out there in this vast Internet landscape. Then, why on earth is this movie so good? Sure, maybe some folks will say the movie is just a predictable Lifetime TV movie, but honestly it is much more than that. There are some elements that makes this film seem destined for the television at times, but to me it is much more than that. I consider the movie to be an honest, emotional portrayal about fatherhood and family. Directed by Robert Lieberman, this film is about a man named J.P Tannen (Jon Voight) who fails at being fathe...
Read more