The General (1926)

 The General (1926)


Watching the classics, everyone has one of those films that they cannot identify with, and they ask, “How do people like the movie the way they do?” For me, Buster Keaton’s The General was that movie for me. It was not terrible by any stretch of the imagination, but I was not truly enthralled. I have not seen many silent films in my life, but I am a fan of Chaplin. I scratch my head in disappointment given the praise that was sung. Still, there is much to admire. Keaton did all the stunts, even the more dangerous stunts, with such acrobatic grace. The first ten minutes are great. The scene where Keaton is turned away from the Confederacy because of his “train engineer” status and the subsequent walk to his love’s house is fantastic. But the rest of the film does not live up to that scene. Maybe another rewatch will be the cards?

I will give Keaton the praise of authenticity. His movie was based on a train chase that took place between the Union and Confederates. He did change some parts like making the Union the bad guys because he felt people wouldn’t believe the Confederates as the villains. Given Keaton’s resume, everyone was excited to get production rolling. For many reasons, the film did go over budget. It was already the most expensive silent film, but the bills kept adding up. Whether it was due to expensive chase scenes, or an injury to Keaton, the money kept flowing. Upon release, the film was a box office bomb. The film did get horrible reviews but, of course, contemporary reviews have been much kinder. Still, talkies were now the part of cinematic life. Keaton took an ill-advised contract with MGM which essentially ended the career as Keaton knew it. It is sad because the man was talented. I think Chaplin is a bit better, but Keaton is no slouch based on this one film. It is disappointing I thought most of the film fell flat.

Johnnie Gray (Buster Keaton) works as a train engineer for his locomotive, The General. When the Civil War begins, Johnnie is unable to enlist because of his occupation. His love of his life, Annabelle (Marion Mack), does not believe him and is ashamed. She tells him not to speak to her until he is wearing the uniform. The Union has a plan to steal the General. Once they do, Annabelle happens to be on board. Johnnie now makes it his duty to rescue his sweetheart.

Keaton himself is the best part of the movie. Maybe not his directing, but his actual performance. He does not create scenes around gags, but rather the opposite. Some are funny, some are not. He does try his best. I was surprised how much action the film had. He did all the stunts and did them with such grace. I do want to see his earlier body of work. Marion Mack is a decent love interest for Keaton, but nothing is memorable about her performance.

I really wanted to like The General. The story fell apart pretty quickly. Keaton is the only glue that holds the movie together, and that glue is barely holding. Like I said, everyone has a classic film they are less fond of than others. This, sadly, happens to be mine. This was the movie that derailed Keaton’s career and it really is a shame to see a cinematic giant fall out like that. This is not a complete failure, but only if it had more effective laughs/gags/.

My Grade: C

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ferris Bueller's Day Off (1986)

Image
Ferris Bueller's Day Off (1986) “Life moves pretty fast. If you don’t stop and look around once in awhile, you could miss it.” Ah, wise words from our new young friend, Ferris Bueller. In John Hughes’s 1986 film, Ferris Bueller’s Day Off , all Ferris wants to do is take a day and have fun. That is the most simplistic theme the movie has. You can go deeper, but the main takeaway is that it is okay to have fun. That is a motto I have taken to heart. I really loved the film. People consider The Breakfast Club to be Hughes’s best and most important movie. That’s a fine statement to make, but I would personally rank the film number two behind this particular one. The teen characters are instantly relatable, it has a memorable antagonist for the children, and this is basically a thirty-year-old travel guide for Chicago. Just how Woody Allen creates his movies as love letters for New York, this is applicable for John Hughes. A Chicago love letter!   Like all of his films, Hughes wrote...
Read more

The Spy Who Loved Me (1977)

Image
The Spy Who Loved Me (1977) The James Bond franchise is one of those franchises that will never die. It has been going strong since the first movie rolled out in the early 1960’s, and new James Bond movies are still produced today. What makes this series unique is they use multiple actors to play the titular character over the years. They all bring their own gravitas to the role, and each Bond is a different man when compared to each other (although the martini, shaken not stirred and the beautiful women among other things remain a constant.) So my first James Bond review for this blog is 1977’s The Spy Who Loved Me. This wasn’t my first look at the series, but it was my first look at the older movies. I really liked what I saw. This is an old-fashioned story that combines a spy drama and an action-packed war movie into one package. Like many of the older Bond movies, the story can get borderline preposterous. The cheesiness of the plot did come to grow on me after awhile, even...
Read more

Table for Five (1983)

Image
Table for Five (1983) I can guarantee that ninety percent of my readers here have not seen this tear-jerking melodrama 1983’s Table for Five , yet alone heard of it. Hopefully after reading my kind words, you will be somewhat intrigued by this movie. When doing my research for the film, I was shocked to see how vastly underrated the movie is. There are only a few reviews on Rotten Tomatoes, hardly any information on Wikipedia or Google-hardly anything out there in this vast Internet landscape. Then, why on earth is this movie so good? Sure, maybe some folks will say the movie is just a predictable Lifetime TV movie, but honestly it is much more than that. There are some elements that makes this film seem destined for the television at times, but to me it is much more than that. I consider the movie to be an honest, emotional portrayal about fatherhood and family. Directed by Robert Lieberman, this film is about a man named J.P Tannen (Jon Voight) who fails at being fathe...
Read more