Defending Your Life (1991)

 Defending Your Life (1991)


Albert Brooks’s comedy Defending Your Life is a thoughtful, amusing, and generally light-hearted film despite a topic that can be pretty grim depending on your view. There are movies that ask the question, “What happens when you die?” Some movies can be philosophical or even religious. Brooks, on the other hand, chose a different and more intelligent approach to the subject matter. He approached our heavenly adventures as a courtroom film with prosecutors and judges. A very unique spin that is designed to make you think. Brooks later said that he received letters from people whose relatives are dying or dying themselves, and this film made them feel better about their journey ahead. It does ask some questions that can hit home hard. Have you done enough with your life? Is there anything that you could have done better? With only one life given to you, you should live it to the fullest. That was the message that came across for me. The screenplay, written by Brooks, is amusing without many belly laughs (as his films rarely are). My only issue is that while the themes are hard-hitting, the screenplay screams these themes at us for the entire film it seems. I was curious about the outcome of the film’s plot. I like its positive, satisfactory ending which is actually rare for a Brooks feature.

 

Daniel Miller (Albert Brooks) is a successful executive who is proud of his new BMW purchase. The car…and his life go kaboom when he plows into a bus when focusing on his Barbra Streisand album. He wakes up in this place called Judgement City. This city is similar to Earth except the weather is clear and anyone can eat as much food without gaining a pound. What’s the catch? People are put on trial to decide whether to “move on” or “go back.” Clips from the past are used for the trial and fear, rather than the commandments or laws, is the factor looked at in making any decision. Daniel’s cheerful defense lawyer Bob Diamond (Rip Torn) assures him of the situation and that getting pass prosecutor Lena Foster (Lee Grant) will be no easy task. Then he meets Julia (Meryl Streep). Julia has better accommodations and is even on a first-name basis with her defense attorney which Daniel attributes for her living a better life. Yet, he falls in love with her. He is worried that she will “move on” but he will be sent back.

 

This is not a film about bad or good people. It is merely a study about how people live their lives and how they should approach their life. All the characters are very personable or interesting and each actor did a good job in their roles. Albert Brooks showed the most growth and you feel for his character as he goes through many emotions (and had a funny scene eating sushi alone). Even when she doesn’t give all her best, it is a testament to Meryl Streep’s acting skills that made her character one someone could connect with. Streep and Brooks worked so well together. Rip Torn had some of the best lines as I loved his explanation on how he uses every part of the brain.

 

Defending Your Life failed at the box office which isn’t a surprise given the deep material. I commend Brooks for his wise courtroom approach and not being afraid to ask questions even if it can be constant. Brooks did not want to be religious in terms of tone, but rather philosophical. I bought the sparks between Brooks and Streep because both characters are interesting, and the romance angle gave a place for the film to go. It is not a popular movie, but some digging would give you an opportunity watch a good, unique film.

 

My Grade: B

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ferris Bueller's Day Off (1986)

Image
Ferris Bueller's Day Off (1986) “Life moves pretty fast. If you don’t stop and look around once in awhile, you could miss it.” Ah, wise words from our new young friend, Ferris Bueller. In John Hughes’s 1986 film, Ferris Bueller’s Day Off , all Ferris wants to do is take a day and have fun. That is the most simplistic theme the movie has. You can go deeper, but the main takeaway is that it is okay to have fun. That is a motto I have taken to heart. I really loved the film. People consider The Breakfast Club to be Hughes’s best and most important movie. That’s a fine statement to make, but I would personally rank the film number two behind this particular one. The teen characters are instantly relatable, it has a memorable antagonist for the children, and this is basically a thirty-year-old travel guide for Chicago. Just how Woody Allen creates his movies as love letters for New York, this is applicable for John Hughes. A Chicago love letter!   Like all of his films, Hughes wrote...
Read more

The Spy Who Loved Me (1977)

Image
The Spy Who Loved Me (1977) The James Bond franchise is one of those franchises that will never die. It has been going strong since the first movie rolled out in the early 1960’s, and new James Bond movies are still produced today. What makes this series unique is they use multiple actors to play the titular character over the years. They all bring their own gravitas to the role, and each Bond is a different man when compared to each other (although the martini, shaken not stirred and the beautiful women among other things remain a constant.) So my first James Bond review for this blog is 1977’s The Spy Who Loved Me. This wasn’t my first look at the series, but it was my first look at the older movies. I really liked what I saw. This is an old-fashioned story that combines a spy drama and an action-packed war movie into one package. Like many of the older Bond movies, the story can get borderline preposterous. The cheesiness of the plot did come to grow on me after awhile, even...
Read more

Unconquered (1947)

Unconquered (1947) Unconquered is one of those old, swash-buckling epics that came out during the era of epics during the 1940’s and 1950’s. Is it the greatest epic ever? Of course not, but all that matters to me was the entertainment factor of the movie. In that part, the movie succeeded. I had a fun time watching our main character, Chris Holden pick fights with the Natives, his fellow countrymen, and even the women. I’m not sure if this film is entirely historically accurate and some whitewashing may be prevalent, but does it really matter much? Especially in an older movie like this film? This film was filmed in technicolor , which of course added to the “expensive” budget, but it really gave definition to the epic as lighting and color techniques helped this film out. I find it rather fascinating what the film was based on. In  1862, the descendants of the Holdens of Virginia wrote a letter about similar events to the one Anny Hale gone through in the film. The basic ...
Read more