Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves (1991)
Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves (1991)
Here we go with another
adaptation of Robin Hood. The Robin Hood tale has been told many times over and
over. The edition that made the biggest bucks at the box office is Kevin Reynolds’s
Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves. In my opinion, it barely squeaks by with
a passing grade. There are moments of fun and lots of adventure. The action is
pretty good and well-choreographed. It is certainly more graphic than I have
imagined it would be. Most of the performances, especially those from Alan Rickman
and Morgan Freeman, are good. I also consider Michael Kamen’s score to be
magnificent and one of his most epic, lushest scores. Even to this day, Bryan
Adams’s ballad “Everything I Do (I Do It for You) remains a popular, soulful
hit. Unfortunately, there are some glaring issues. After Kevin Costner
delivered an emotional engaging performance in Dance with Wolves, he
delivers the complete opposite here. His accent would be right at home in LA,
certainly not in medieval England. In addition, the screenplay is really silly.
In fact, Rickman was allowed to come up with his own lines because he found the
screenplay loathingly bad. I hope someone taught the screenwriters how to write
good dialogue because many lines had me unintentionally laughing. I did like
this version’s interpretation of the legend. Robin Hood is portrayed as more
serious, more socially conscious unlike the earlier Errol Flynn versions.
Pen Densham and his
producing partner John Watson originally came up with the idea to create a
version of Robin Hood who learned to be a more socially conscious person while
imprisoned during the Crusades. The studio felt the screenplay was screaming with
magic and was fast tracked into production to avoid clashes with dueling Robin
Hood features. After all, the first one released is usually the winner as in
the case of this feature (at least financially). Reynolds and Costner
originally worked together on a smaller film seven years previously. Reynolds
also assisted Costner during the challenging buffalo hunt scene in Dance
with Wolves. Costner was going to turn down the film unless Reynolds was at
the helm because he was more suited to direct the epic action. Production was
quick because of Costner’s hectic schedule. Most of the film was shot on location
so the audience got to see some great shots of some English forests along Hadrian’s
Wall. A quick shout out to Douglas Milsome’s exceptional cinematography. Sadly,
Reynolds left the project at the tail end because of studio interference, which
also explains the poor editing choices. The studio wanted to cut some Rickman
scenes because they did not want him to overshadow Costner. I mean, didn’t that
happen anyway?
Robin Locksley (Kevin
Costner) fighting for Richard the Lionheart (Sean Connery) in the Crusades returns
to England after escaping from a dungeon along with his intelligent Moor friend
Azeem (Morgan Freeman) who fights alongside Robin to pay off a debt. Robin
learns that his father has been murdered by the evil, corrupt Sheriff of
Nottingham (Alan Rickman). He flees to the Sherwood Forest where he vows to go
after the Sheriff. With the help of his merry men that includes the likes of
Will Scarlet (Christian Slater), they aim to take down the Sheriff and his
political ambitions.
Costner has had better
roles. Even if his accent is not bothersome, his performance just feels…off. He
has no romantic chemistry with Marion (played good as possibly can by Mary
Elizabeth Mastrantonio). It felt like they were familiar with the story and had
to fall in love because that is necessary. The supporting cast is where the
performances shine. Freeman fit right in with the tone. He used humor when
appropriate and is a good friend to Robin Hood. Rickman outdoes everyone when
he plays the villain, isn’t that right? First in Die Hard, and now here.
Rickman’s interpretation of the Sheriff of Nottingham is the best part of the movie.
He was evil….yet he was also hilarious. I am glad he got permission to create
his own lines because they were much needed.
I thoroughly enjoyed Robin
Hood: Prince of Thieves. Outside of Rickman’s magnificent villainous
performance, this version is rather forgettable. But it is fun to watch in the
two plus hours on screen. Stay for the supporting performances, the action (especially
the final action set piece), and Michael Kamen’s awesome orchestral score. If
only the screenplay was not dumb and Costner had a better lead performance, this
might have been a classic. Might have been! Oh well, this is still plain ol’
dumb fun.
My Grade: B-
Comments
Post a Comment